Donte Whitner, safety for the SF 49ers, has filed an application to change his last name to Hitner. The hearing in Cuyahoga Probate Court is set for Nov. 19. His application for the change says it will be commercially favorable to him in various business ventures (and presumably in terms of increased jersey sales).
Two quick points:
1. In a bit of irony, the 49ers play the Washington Redskins, a team under siege for not changing its name, in his first game after the name change.
2. Unless the white supremacist market is larger than I believe, I doubt there is huge demand for a jersey with a name that could easily be mistaken for "Hitler."
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Monday, October 7, 2013
If You Have to Ask, . . . .
An individual who is a beneficiary of his uncle's estate asked the Ethicist at the NYT if he should follow his uncle's instructions to donate several thousand dollars to various charities. The instructions were made in a letter accompanying the will. The beneficiary perceived the groups to be "extremely right wing" and was offended by some of them. The Ethicist instructed the beneficiary to make the donations or not take any money.
Several points:
1. Leaving money to someone with the expectation that he will share it with someone else or a charity is not legally binding nor a good idea (see the comment about not legally binding).
2. Charitable bequests should be made in the will so they are carried out (and so charitable deductions are effective).
3. Expecting anyone from California to donate money to a conservative cause is tilting at windmills.
Friday, September 27, 2013
Something's Got to Give
The estate of Herb Stern, the photographer famous for taking the Last Sitting photos of Marilyn Monroe 6 weeks prior to her death, is poised for a will contest. The 83 year old executed a will in 1997 which left half of his estate to his children from his first marriage with the other half establishing a foundation. He subsequently executed a will and a trust in 2010 which left his $10 million estate, save for a few cash bequests to his children, for the benefit of his 44 year old wife, whom he had secretly married in 2009.
Several points:
1. It is perfectly logical for a man to alter his will to provide for his wife who was not in his life at the time of the will he signed 13 years prior.
2. The new will has a no contest provision stating that anyone contesting the will will forfeit their inheritance. If this clause is coupled with significant bequests to the children it could curtail a will contest by them.
3. Secret marriage? Perhaps Mr. Stern and his wife were channeling Marilyn Monroe film titles. Instead of "We're Not Married" they decided to "Let's Make it Legal" because Stern was only "As Young As You Feel" and followed the axiom that "Gentlemen Prefer Blondes." Once the facts are revealed, "Something's Got to Give." My apologies in advance.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
If At First You Don't Succeed . . . . ..Forge? (No, Just Kidding).
This is out of a horror movie. A Kansas City attorney was recently charged with murder
for killing her father's girlfriend of 20 years. Her father was shot
and his girlfriend was repeatedly stabbed then shot at their vacation
home in 2010. Her father did not die from his wounds. The woman then
allegedly forged a health care power of attorney so she could withdraw
his medical support 4 days later. She was charged with his murder a
year ago. Apparently, she was concerned that her father would leave all
of his assets to his soon to be wife. In an odd but clarifying
footnote, her mother (her father's first wife), had spent 11 months in
jail for stealing $100,000 from her own mother by forging a power of
attorney 10 years ago.
Points?
1. If the father had wanted
to preserve assets for his daughter he could have executed a pre-nuptial
agreement to set forth which assets he would leave his soon to be wife
(and what would be left for his daughter).
2. Along the same
lines, he could have executed a trust to provide for his new wife while
leaving the remainder to his daughter after the wife's death.
3.
Preparing a health care power of attorney to address medical needs is
essential. So is ensuring that the person with that responsibility has
a copy of the document and is aware of the duties.
4. When a
daughter resents her father and his girlfriend, and her biological
mother has already stolen from her own mother, an active alarm system
and a multitude of security cameras would be a worthy investment. And
perhaps a Kevlar jacket.
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Visits Trump Cards (Huguette Clark Pt. 3)
I previously blogged about the will dispute over Huguette Clark's fortune, here and here. Now the issue is set for trial in the next week. I snarkily wrote "When
a distant relative is a Gilded Age heiress, a Christmas card and
occasional phone call provide a great return on investment." It turns
out that her great-grandniece did send her a Christmas card for 33 years
until her death and was still excluded from the will. Actually, the
great-grandniece and other distant relatives were included initially in a
2005 will but then excluded by a revised will she signed a month
later. However, no relative saw Ms. Clark between 1968 and her death in
2011. The excluded relatives are challenging a will which left most of
her fortune to her caregivers, her support network (including her
attorney), and the hospital in which she resided for her last 20 years.
Several points:
1. 1968? 43 years before her death? Those relatives were not important to Ms. Clark. Nor was she to them.
2.
The grounds for challenging a will are either lack of mental capacity
or undue influence. If she was not competent to execute the second
will, it is doubtful she was competent the prior month to leave
everything to the relatives.
3. The lawyer drafting a will should
never be a beneficiary of the will. He should bring in another
attorney to prevent the appearance of undue influence by him.
4.
My guess (which based on my prior snark and other poor predictions in
this blog is probably wrong) is that she reflexively signed a will
leaving her assets to her relatives even though she had not seen them
since the RFK and MLK assassinations and the moon landing, then
reconsidered and decided to leave her assets to people who had made a
difference in her life.
5. More bloggers, and journalists, should admit their poor prognostication abilities.
Friday, September 13, 2013
Sports, Not Death
Paul Daugherty of the Cincinnati Enquirer has once again graciously allowed me to write his blog today. Link is here.
Thursday, September 12, 2013
I See Gullibility
An English woman is a key witness against a Florida psychic on trial for defrauding people of $25 million. The woman sought the assistance of the psychic when her husband was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer shortly after leaving her. The psychic was supposed to prolong the estranged husband's life by two years and have him return to her if the woman divested herself of the "tainted" money she made when selling the castle she and her husband owned. In a future plot line from Downton Abbey, when the husband died six months later, he left his wife no money in his will and authorized a servant to use his frozen sperm to have an IVF child. In spite of the failure of the psychic to accomplish her goals, the woman continued to give money to the psychic ($900k total) to prevent the servant from bearing a child with her late husband.
Several points:
1. In Ohio, a husband may not disinherit his wife. The wife is entitled to at least 1/3 of the assets under his will.
2. When a deceased spouse has left a mess of his personal affairs, it is best to seek the counsel of an attorney, not the psychic whose shop is across the street from one's hotel.
3. Never tell a psychic how much money one has, do not believe in tainted money, giving money to a psychic does not untaint it . . . Heck, just avoid psychics in general.
4. When an estranged husband wants out of a marriage then dies shortly thereafter authorizing a servant to conceive his child and tries to disinherit his spouse, and one ends up with $2 million plus one -third of his estate, do not be mournful and hire a psychic. Be thankful the cad is out of one's life.
Labels:
Downton Abbey,
elective share,
estate planning,
IVF,
psychics,
Rose Marks,
wills
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)